Dalton and Tomich white logo

Category: Ecclesiastical Abstention

Ecclesiastical Abstention

When Tithes Meet the Courts: Understanding Leach v. Gateway Church and the First Amendment Shield

Can a church member sue their church if tithes and offerings are allocated differently than promised in a sermon or on a website? Can a donor demand a refund based on a pastor’s pulpit pledge? A ruling from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas offers answers to these questions. In Katherine Leach et al. v. Gateway Church, Robert Morris, and Steve Dulin (Civil Action No. 4:24-cv-885, decided June 23, 2026), District Judge Amos L. Mazzant dismissed a class-action lawsuit brought by church members seeking refunds of their tithes. Grounding its decision in the constitutional First Amendment and recent Fifth Circuit precedent, the court reaffirmed a foundational doctrine of American law: civil courts cannot step inside the sanctuary to police how churches allocate donated tithes or evaluate statements made from the pulpit.

Read More »
Ecclesiastical Abstention

A church’s action to evict pastoral staff from a church-owned parsonage is not barred by eccelesiastical abstention

The First Amendment Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine does not bar civil courts from resolving real property claims involving religious entities where the dispute can be decided using neutral principles of law without determining underlying theological or doctrinal questions. A defrocked bishop residing in a church-owned parsonage without a lease or rent payments is a licensee, not a tenant under Maryland property law, whose possessory rights terminate immediately upon revocation by the property owner.

Read More »
Church Property Disputes/Denominational Splits

THE BOUNDARIES OF CIVIL JUSTICE AND FAITH: the Sweeping Scope of the Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine in Michigan

On July 15, 2026, the Michigan Court of Appeals delivered a forceful reminder of this constitutional boundary in Rev. Dr. Marcus L. Lovelace v. Mt. Zion Baptist Church, et al. (Docket No. 371028). The court affirmed the wholesale summary dismissal of a former senior pastor’s breach of contract, tortious interference, and defamation claims. This commentary deconstructs the court’s application of the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine and evaluates the profound operational realities the ruling imposes on religious entities and employment law practitioners in Michigan.

Read More »
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

Please note that this website may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Prior results described on this site do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases or transactions.